jesus was a scapegote

jesus did not take the blame for te sins, nobody is saying jesus comited all the sins of his followers. they are just saying he payed the price. of course I never got that part. jesus was suposedly 1 part of a 3 part god ( the holey spirit, the father, the son) so basiclythe timline is as fallows:
1. God makes a rule damning people to hell if they do not make a blood sacrafice to him when they break one of his other rules
2. god decides he dosent like the rule any more
3. god sends jesus to earth
4 god lets jesus get killed
5 god brings jesus back to life
6 god changes the rule

now any sane person is going to start asking questions to the logic of this.if god made the rule couldnt this all powerful god change the rule? why go through all the trouble of killing part of yourself to change the rule? for that mater why dose all knowing, compassinate god need people to kill to forgive them?

The difrence between athiests and the anti-religus

just because athiests don't belive in god dose not mean we violently apose to religen some might go as far to say athiesm is a form of religen. but ant-religus is another thing entirly the anti-religus people who violently apose to religen and call them selves athiests are no real athiests. the real athiests are the ones who are free thinkers and do not need the belife of eternil tourture and damnation to do good things. most of us belive in darwins theory of evolution and that people didnt just pop into existence.